Follow science, not emotion
“We have to follow the science, not emotions,” said one speaker, setting the tone of discussion. They argued that the possible TPD revision is an opportunity to realise the full potential of reduced-risk products. Accepting a clear problem with underage vapers, it was remarked that a critical aspect of the regulatory framework was largely ineffective – enforcement.
Youth access, they said, was too easy. There is, they explained, a lack of enforcement of the current rules, and a failure to properly consider additional proportionate rules to stop “irresponsible products” coming onto the market. By banning what they called “responsible flavours and descriptors”, they argued that there is a loss of public utility in helping adult smokers come off combustibles.
It was also remarked that an overly broad interpretation of WHO FCTC Article 5.3, to the point of attempting to regulate public discussions on tobacco and new nicotine products: “manifests injustice not to include all parties in the debate and the need for more balance,” – given that the industry is largely excluded from the policy discussion.
Swedish success in shifting to a low number of smokers was, said one speaker, thanks to Sweden’s policy on harm reduction. The Swedes applied lower taxes on snus and higher taxes on cigarettes, with one panellist arguing that the EU should allow oral tobacco products, and regulate nicotine pouches, within the single market.
TPD2 to TPD3
The European Commission’s ongoing evaluation of the Tobacco Products Directive (TPD2) (adopted in 2014 and effective since 2016) deals with the scope of manufacturing regulation, presentation, and sale of nicotine products in the EU, including traditional cigarettes, and fine-cut tobacco, as well as new nicotine products, such as e-cigarettes, heated tobacco.
The evaluation timeline expects a conclusion in Q3-Q4 2024, and the earliest the TPD3 proposal could come would be around Q1-Q2 2026.
Speakers expressed concern that the TPD3 proposal may be so onerous and restrictive that the public health potential of harm reduction may be cancelled by introducing unreasonable barriers to adult consumers of new nicotine products, despite tobacco harm reduction (THR) success in reducing smoking rates in some Member States.
Discussing possible new restrictions under TPD3, the panel listed a ban on flavours in new nicotine products; a ban on nicotine pouches; stricter packaging and labelling requirements for all products; and altogether, no longer a reduced risk distinction between combustible products and new nicotine products.
Responding to Euractiv’s questioning on the validity of THR measures in the context of new underage users, panellists remarked that they support EU proposals to ban youth-appealing product designs and flavour descriptors, without limiting the variety of flavours available.
Flavours
Flavours in e-cigarettes, they said, play a crucial role in helping adult smokers transition away from smoking. Most adult smokers, they argued, who have transitioned to e-cigarettes, have used flavoured products.
There was further discussion about the validity of “real-world evidence” shows that disposable e-cigarettes provide a more accessible entry point for adult smokers switching to new nicotine products, compared to refillable electronic cigarettes. Panellists argued that a ban would be “disastrous for the transition to potentially reduced-risk products and, worse, may push adult smokers towards unregulated and unsafe illicit disposables.”
*This article is an edited version of a report published by Euractiv in April 2024.
